MTV stands for Music Television. Pretty simple idea: TV about music, which includes, by my definition, singing competitions, documentaries about musicians, and of course, music videos. I just looked at twelve hours worth of MTV listings (7pm on 8/26 - 7am on 8/27) and I didn't find a single music related program. All of them were reality shows. I see a bit of a problem there.
It's apparent that MTV did this because shows like Survivor and The Real World were becoming hits. The problem is that if you keep copying old hits, what's going to happen when people get tired of the new thing? Who'll come up with the new new thing?
The BIGGER problem, consequently, is this. If other networks start copying off of you, and other networks copy off of networks that are copies of you, and, in turn, other networks copy off of those, what's stopping us from having a whole TV with 274 channels that are homogenized, cookie-cutter clones of the other 273? The scary answer to that question is nothing. Think about it.
You're president of XYZ Network. If 123 Network, your competitor, is airing a genre of programming, such as reality, and whooping you in thw ratings, and you had to greenlight a show, would you go with a reality show similar in format to 123's reality show, or a risky sci-fi drama?
As a logical buisiness move, you'd go with the first option. In part two Sunday, I'll show you the other side of the coin, and why, in making the "logical" desicion, you would've shot yourself in the foot. And the best way to illustrate that is to put another network under the microscope.
See you then!
Tomato
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you're having problems commenting, please e-mail me (silvertomatoproductions@gmail.com) with a description of your problem. I've contacted Blogger about the issue, and it should be resolved soon,
Sorry,
Tomato